Posts tagged California Uniform Trade Secrets Act.
Blogs
2 minute read
A recent decision from the Northern District of California, Magic Leap, Inc. v. Bradski et. al., shows that employers must meet a high standard when filing a California Code of Civil Procedure Section 2019.210 disclosure statement under the California Uniform Trade Secrets Act (“CUTSA”). See California Civil Code § 3426 et seq. The disclosure statement, which does not have a counterpart in the federal Defend Trade Secrets Act, requires a plaintiff to “identify the trade secret with reasonable particularity” before it can conduct discovery of the defendants’ evidence ...
Blogs
5 minute read
When an employee leaves his or her employment in California, under what circumstances may a former employee solicit his former employer's customers? Can non-solicitation agreements ever be enforceable under California law?
Blogs
3 minute read
A recent California Court of Appeal decision sheds light on whether certain state law claims are pre-empted under the California Uniform Trade Secrets Act.
Blog Editors
Recent Updates
- Georgia Supreme Court Allows for Employee Non-Solicitation Agreements That Lack Express Geographic Limits
- Continued Employment May Constitute Sufficient Consideration for Noncompete Agreements in Connecticut, but Uncertainty Remains
- What the FTC Non-Compete Ban Block Means for Employers - Employment Law This Week Video
- Texas Court Shoots Down FTC Noncompete Ban Nationwide
- Florida Court Joins Texas Court in Granting Preliminary Injunction Against FTC’s Final Rule Banning Noncompetes, but Limits Scope of Injunction to Named Plaintiff