In another decision expansively interpreting California Business & Professions Code § 16600 and which could have a significant effect on employment litigation settlements, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals reversed the district court’s enforcement of a settlement agreement and remanded the case to the district court to determine whether a no employment provision in the agreement is a “restraint of substantial character” to the Plaintiff's medical practice. Golden v. California Emergency Physicians Medical Group; Med America; Mark Alderdice; Robert Buscho, United ...
Blog Editors
Recent Updates
- Maine Restricts Noncompetes For Health Care Practitioners
- Utah Bans Post-Employment Noncompetes for Healthcare Workers Effective May 6, 2026
- Garden Leave Provisions in Employment Agreements: 2026 Update
- 50-State Noncompete Survey Updated Amid Growing State Restrictions
- Virginia Approves SB170: Expanded Restrictions on Enforcement of Noncompetes Take Effect July 1, 2026