Featured on Employment Law This Week - An Illinois appellate court weighs in on social media and solicitation. The case involved a defendant who sent LinkedIn connection requests to three former coworkers, even though he had signed a non-solicit agreement. In considering whether social media activity violates non-solicitation agreements, other courts have drawn a distinction between passive social media activity and more active, direct activity. Though these requests were made directly to the former coworkers, the court in this case ruled that the content constituted ...
In this age of social media, a frequently asked question is whether social media activity can violate a non-compete or non-solicit. Although the case law is evolving, courts which have addressed the issue have focused on the content of the communication, rather than the medium used to convey it. In so doing, they have distinguished between mere passive social media activity (e.g., posting an update about a new job) as opposed to more targeted, active actions (e.g., not merely posting about a new job, but also actively recruiting former co-workers or clients).
A “LinkedIn” case ...
Blog Editors
Recent Updates
- Spilling Secrets Podcast: Trade Secrets on Trial - Strategic Decisions for the Courtroom
- The Sunshine State Joins Kansas in Introducing Employer-Friendly Restrictive Covenant Legislation
- States Continue to Introduce Legislation Aimed at Restricting Noncompete Agreements
- Health Care Non-Competes: 2025
- Wyoming Joins the List of States Banning Some Noncompete Agreements