Whenever possible, restrictive covenants should be carefully worded to track the language of applicable law in the jurisdiction where they will be enforced. The South Dakota Supreme Court’s recent decision in Farm Bureau Life Insurance Co. v. Dolly provides a strong reminder of this lesson. The case concerned an action by Farm Bureau to enforce a restrictive covenant against Ryan Dolly who had worked for Farm Bureau as a captive life insurance agent. Dolly’s contract with Farm Bureau contained a restrictive covenant providing that Dolly would “neither sell nor solicit ...
Blog Editors
Recent Updates
- Spilling Secrets Podcast: Trade Secrets on Trial - Strategic Decisions for the Courtroom
- The Sunshine State Joins Kansas in Introducing Employer-Friendly Restrictive Covenant Legislation
- States Continue to Introduce Legislation Aimed at Restricting Noncompete Agreements
- Health Care Non-Competes: 2025
- Wyoming Joins the List of States Banning Some Noncompete Agreements