The Illinois Supreme Court recently announced that it was not going to review an Illinois Appellate Court decision, Fifield v. Premier Dealer Services, Inc., which held that, absent other consideration, two years of employment is required for a restrictive covenant to be deemed supported by adequate consideration – even where the employee signed the restrictive covenant as a condition to his employment offer – and even where the employee voluntarily resigned.

The Appellate Court’s decision generated significant discussion among practitioners, as well as some expectation that the Illinois Supreme Court would weigh in. To date, no published decision has either cited it or applied it.

As we noted in a blog post last July, to our knowledge, Fifield is the first Illinois state court decision to hold that an offer of employment by itself is not sufficient consideration for a restrictive covenant.

Absent further developments in the Illinois courts or legislative intervention, Illinois employers hoping to enforce restrictive covenants within two years of the signing date should provide some consideration in addition to the offer of employment or continued employment (in the case of current employees). Alternatively, employers could also consider offering “garden leave” – a mandatory notice period at the end of employment during which the employee remains on the payroll (and therefore continues to owe a fiduciary duty of loyalty to the employer then paying him or her) but is not expected to perform any services. 

Back to Trade Secrets & Employee Mobility Blog

Search This Blog

Blog Editors


Related Services



Jump to Page


Sign up to receive an email notification when new Trade Secrets & Employee Mobility posts are published:

Privacy Preference Center

When you visit any website, it may store or retrieve information on your browser, mostly in the form of cookies. This information might be about you, your preferences or your device and is mostly used to make the site work as you expect it to. The information does not usually directly identify you, but it can give you a more personalized web experience. Because we respect your right to privacy, you can choose not to allow some types of cookies. Click on the different category headings to find out more and change our default settings. However, blocking some types of cookies may impact your experience of the site and the services we are able to offer.

Strictly Necessary Cookies

These cookies are necessary for the website to function and cannot be switched off in our systems. They are usually only set in response to actions made by you which amount to a request for services, such as setting your privacy preferences, logging in or filling in forms. You can set your browser to block or alert you about these cookies, but some parts of the site will not then work. These cookies do not store any personally identifiable information.

Performance Cookies

These cookies allow us to count visits and traffic sources so we can measure and improve the performance of our site. They help us to know which pages are the most and least popular and see how visitors move around the site. All information these cookies collect is aggregated and therefore anonymous. If you do not allow these cookies we will not know when you have visited our site, and will not be able to monitor its performance.